View Full Version: If in time of war/emergencies

Philippines Defense Forces Forum > Reservists and ROTC > If in time of war/emergencies

Pages: [1] 2

Title: If in time of war/emergencies


Judd - August 30, 2005 04:18 AM (GMT)
if in time of war, would there be enough weapons to arm the reservists???

would it be:

"the one with the rifle shoots! the one without follows him...if the one with the rifle gets killed, the one who's following picks up the rifle and shoots!"

just like sa enemy at the gates..hehe




adroth - August 30, 2005 06:05 PM (GMT)
The marines recently resurrected a bunch of M-3s which were taken from the naval reserve armories. This suggests that that the AFP does have something up its sleeve

http://www.timawa.net/m3/m3gen2.htm

Wardog - August 31, 2005 01:40 AM (GMT)
Might not be enough but we can always go back to our trusted bolos and ginuntings and strat from there. :armywink:

MSantor - September 17, 2005 03:00 PM (GMT)
My parents always say the China's PLA will die laughing if they ever invade the Philippines because of what kind of weapons we have. (I know this doesn't apply to the whole AFP, especially the Scout Rangers, but this point kinda applies to the reservists and our F5As).


Judd - September 30, 2005 08:19 AM (GMT)
awkie.. u forgot to mention the humble arnis.. hehe.. :drunk:

anyway, gunsmiths in danao might be of good help. almost everyone can make their own guns - pinoy pa! my uncle hired one and he made a homemade shotgun complete with a wooden stock (i dont know what kind of wood), and a magazine! it looks a lot like an M14 kung sa malayo.. it's also a bolt-action weapon. i laughed when i saw it while at the same time im impressed by the ingenuity. that shotgun was actually used during the MILF offensive in my uncle's home in maigo, lanao del norte (may 2003).


check out my website shadesofgreen.tk..

adroth - September 30, 2005 03:49 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (MSantor @ Sep 17 2005, 07:00 AM)
. . . but this point kinda applies to the reservists

The CAFGUs are also classified as reservists. Even if they do use older equipment, remember, Israel kicked Arab butt during the war in the 60's and 70's while still using equipment that was over 30 years old.

Given that reservists are more often than not military enthusiasts as well, I wouldn't be surprised if the some of the better off (or who live in dangerous circumstances) have personal equipment that rival, if not exceed, the quality of equipment in the regular force.

Yaberdaber - October 2, 2005 05:46 AM (GMT)
My dad, who was an officer in the '80's, told me that the armories probably won't hold a long term supply if we are to go to war. More than likely, our reservists will have to fend off "enemy supplies" once the initial batch of supplies are depleted.

I don't know about the situation now.

City Hunter - October 2, 2005 12:32 PM (GMT)
He's probably right. From what little that I know most of those kept in armories for such cases aren't maintained in good condition too. Plus, the ammo situation would very well be a problem. But that doesn't mean that we'll be a pushover if the ChiComs will ever attack us by conventional means. There are enough unregistered firearms and gunfreaks abound in our shores.

And its also the very reason why I'm keeping close in hand the designs for the Sten SMG.

Tora^2 - October 2, 2005 04:41 PM (GMT)
Aside from those far-off weapons like Stens and Greaseguns, there are a lot more old weapons the AFP has at their disposal.

First, you have those Elisco M16A1s. Some were sold off through proper channels to local security companies. Some were also sold off to various groups (even insurgents) on the black market. A few are used for training purposes by the Major Services and their Reserve units (ROTC and CAFGUs included). A lot more are in storage.

Older weapons like M3 SMGs, M1 Garands, M14s and M1 Carbines also lie in storage.

City Hunter - October 3, 2005 12:18 AM (GMT)
Meron rin tayong local version ng Ruger Mini 14. Ito yun ginamit namin sa ROTC during drill exercises kasi radio man kami at ang bigat na kapag Garand dinala namin (hindi kami makasabay agad sa rest ng formation). Marami pa rin tayong Thompsons at naka-seal pa nga sila. Mga revolvers natin nabubulok lang sa armory namin sa probinsya. Pati yun 105mm kung pwede nga lang hatakin para i-display sa bahay gagawin namin kasi flat na ang gulong at mataas na ang talahib sa paligid niya.

Pero hindi pa tayo dapat mag-alala. Yun loko kong klasmeyt na itinapon sa China ay nagkalat ng lagim noon. Naalala ninyo ba yun sinunog na bayan sa Mindanao? Ipinagmalaki ng loko kasi na walang sinabi ang martial arts ng mga klasmeyt niya na Chinese, Japanese at Korean (yun mga Westerners syempre nakikinig lang). Dito raw kasi sa Pinas gun freaks ang karamihan at mas uunahin pa ang baril bago sa asawa (well, that's true especially down south). At sinabayan pa kasi ng kwento tungkol sa pinsan ko na nag CAFGU. Kasi namin si insan ay kainuman yun bayaw niya na pulis, kabarkadang sundalo, NPA at Moro rebel (huwag na ninyo ako tanungin bakit umiinom ang Moro na yun at di ko rin alam kung bakit). Lumalabas tuloy na puro warfreak ang mga Pinoy. Kaya nang inimbitahan niya sila na dito magbakasyon ay obvious na lahat tumanggi. At balak pa naman ipakidnap ng mokong kong kaibigan :armygrin:

Plus, its also why its important that the local martial arts be supported. Kahit hindi forced on schools. Ok na na promoted siya by sports and officials as a good way to keep healthy and self-defense. At important rin na gawin itong national sport imbes na sipa (comments on this please as plan ko rin to drop it as a suggestion to our senators).

ctrlaltdel - October 3, 2005 04:38 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (MSantor @ Sep 17 2005, 11:00 PM)
My parents always say the China's PLA will die laughing if they ever invade the Philippines because of what kind of weapons we have. (I know this doesn't apply to the whole AFP, especially the Scout Rangers, but this point kinda applies to the reservists and our F5As).

laughing?? wait until the war turns into guerrilla warfare and lets see if the chinks will still be laughing

:armytwisted:

City Hunter - October 3, 2005 06:18 AM (GMT)
The main problem is that if they go unconventional. As I had pointed out in another thread, we would not last as a nation within 24 hours if the ChiComs attack us that way. We have no prepared defenses against their missiles. No long-range detection gear or alternates (I've an idea or two but am still writing them down). No interceptors too both for air and sea borne attackers. Plus, our medical situation is so grim so how can we survive a chemical and bio-weapon attack. And there is not even a drill nor a posted direction even on where to go when reserves are called into action. We should, at this point, even at the very least know what weapon we will be handling in such an eventuallity, how many ammo will we be issued, what gears will be given or needed to be brought, etc.

Most likely, it'll be a chaotic situation similar to those alien invasion and war movies.

Judd - October 3, 2005 04:55 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (City Hunter @ Oct 3 2005, 02:18 PM)
The main problem is that if they go unconventional. As I had pointed out in another thread, we would not last as a nation within 24 hours if the ChiComs attack us that way. We have no prepared defenses against their missiles. No long-range detection gear or alternates (I've an idea or two but am still writing them down). No interceptors too both for air and sea borne attackers. Plus, our medical situation is so grim so how can we survive a chemical and bio-weapon attack. And there is not even a drill nor a posted direction even on where to go when reserves are called into action. We should, at this point, even at the very least know what weapon we will be handling in such an eventuallity, how many ammo will we be issued, what gears will be given or needed to be brought, etc.

Most likely, it'll be a chaotic situation similar to those alien invasion and war movies.

ur probably right, but if the time comes i doubt we would hold out organized long enough. but a sustained guerilla warfare would harass the enemy as long as they're here. the problem with guns is no problem at all, considering the ingenuity of the filipinos. the sumpak may be too crude and too unsafe to the shooter but it can still kill. the pillbox (karburo wrapped with foil and loaded with rocks and nails) can also make a good grenade. the indyan pana is the simplest. the blow gun. fertilizer bombs. the bolo. molotov cocktail. rocks. boulders for roadblock. what the heck? in times like it, one would surely use anything just to throw at those stinking commies, push them back to their stinking home, make them feed their pandas and make rubber dragons in toyshops instead..

no matter how well armed we may be, we would still be outnumbered. but being outnumbered doesnt mean being outfought. basically we should be at least one step ahead, more advantageous than the enemy. but the truth is, we're still a few leaps behind. so dream's over. i better get back to sleep. its getting late its 2am na.

:patrioticpinoy: pinok kaw ay pinoy, ipakita sa mundo kung anong kaya mooo!

adroth - October 3, 2005 05:48 PM (GMT)
If an aggressor invaded, I wonder how they'd handle Basilan, Jolo, Lanao, etc? If they're smart, they'd promise to grant Bangsa Moro independence to get the MNLF / MILF on their side. The AFP would then have to contend with forces both within and outside the country.

Judd - October 4, 2005 03:15 AM (GMT)
ahh.. lanao del norte, my home.. the chinese would not think twice about taking lanao - esp my iligan where napocor is located (supplying electric power to the whole mindanao main island), and several factories like cement, steel, and food industries, not to mention a strategic base for military operations. but the concentration of muslims here proved this place to be highly volatile. during the second world war, japs did not even dare set up their own quarters around here (according to my granma) bcos they fear moro guerillas who are just as suicidal as they are. the nearest japanese post here is 90 miles away at cagayan de oro which is now lumbia airport and the del monte pineapple plantation.

City Hunter - October 5, 2005 07:44 AM (GMT)
Hmmm. Pwede kaya maghanda na tayo ng gear natin para when we get called up (sana never) ay baril na lang ang kulang? Payagan kaya yun? Baka pag tawagin tayo parang mga Somalians dun sa Black Hawk Down. Tinawag lahat dun sa palengke ng mga baril at isa isa binigyan ng armas. Pero walang training man lang kaya kahit papaano na lang bumaril at dumiskarte.

Judd - October 5, 2005 08:35 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (City Hunter @ Oct 5 2005, 03:44 PM)
Hmmm. Pwede kaya maghanda na tayo ng gear natin para when we get called up (sana never) ay baril na lang ang kulang? Payagan kaya yun? Baka pag tawagin tayo parang mga Somalians dun sa Black Hawk Down. Tinawag lahat dun sa palengke ng mga baril at isa isa binigyan ng armas. Pero walang training man lang kaya kahit papaano na lang bumaril at dumiskarte.

o di kaya ung sa enemy at the gates... binigyan sila ng rifle at ang iba ung ibinigay ang ammo clips lang... hihihi. dapat sundin mo ung me baril para pag tumba sya kunin mo baril nya at, ayun pwede ka nang lumaban! di ka pa pwedeng maka atras kc papatayin ka ng commander mo.

saver111 - October 5, 2005 12:01 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (City Hunter @ Oct 5 2005, 03:44 PM)
Hmmm.  Pwede kaya maghanda na tayo ng gear natin para when we get called up (sana never) ay baril na lang ang kulang?  Payagan kaya yun?  Baka pag tawagin tayo parang mga Somalians dun sa Black Hawk Down.  Tinawag lahat dun sa palengke ng mga baril at isa isa binigyan ng armas.  Pero walang training man lang kaya kahit papaano na lang bumaril at dumiskarte.

Well just like in the U.S., there are many militia freaks in our country. Collecting equipments and weapons more than the allowed number by law from legal and illegal sources. Getting the latest know-how in defense issues keeping themselves updated. Parang dito... :armyroleyes:

commando - October 17, 2005 01:57 AM (GMT)
Why would anyone invade us in the first place? :whogives:

saver111 - October 17, 2005 01:14 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (commando @ Oct 17 2005, 09:57 AM)
Why would anyone invade us in the first place? :whogives:

Commando, the first word of the thread is "if".

fieldmouse - October 18, 2005 01:03 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (saver111 @ Oct 17 2005, 09:14 PM)
QUOTE (commando @ Oct 17 2005, 09:57 AM)
Why would anyone invade us in the first place? :whogives:

Commando, the first word of the thread is "if".

yeheyyy...commando is back again :armyLol:

commando - January 2, 2006 03:14 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (fieldmouse @ Oct 18 2005, 09:03 PM)
QUOTE (saver111 @ Oct 17 2005, 09:14 PM)
QUOTE (commando @ Oct 17 2005, 09:57 AM)
Why would anyone invade us in the first place? :whogives:

Commando, the first word of the thread is "if".

yeheyyy...commando is back again :armyLol:

:aberet: it's gonna take a long time for me to become a full colonel...

jedi knight - January 3, 2006 04:57 AM (GMT)
if there would be an invasion, for sure we'd loose if we choose to face them in a conventional battlefield, wherein in equipments and numbers really count. i think the best way to fight invaders is by establishing guerilla fronts similar in WW2, let them come and give them hell on earth. it's very hard to defeat a guerilla force, even identifying them is already difficult. besides, our natural terrain favors this kind of tactics.

unless the agressors would use nukes but that is a totally different story.

Judd - January 3, 2006 05:52 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (jedi knight @ Jan 3 2006, 12:57 PM)
unless the agressors would use nukes but that is a totally different story.

it's very hard to defeat a guerilla force. :agree:

even the US troops are having a hard time dealing with guerillas in iraq and afghanistan. same is true during the vietnam war.

but nuclear weapons? no foreign aggressor would be smart enough to use nukes against a 100-man band of guerillas.

ian - January 3, 2006 07:59 AM (GMT)
If they would use nukes there would be no point in taking over the nuked territory, unless of course if they just want the wasteland to dump things. :armyroleyes:

BTW, happy new year everyone! :patrioticpinoy:

saver111 - August 9, 2006 01:48 PM (GMT)
Best question would be,

How ready are we?

QUOTE

Israeli reservists ready for action
By Martin Patience
BBC News, Jerusalem

Yakir Segev, 27, was supposed to spend this August hiking in the mountains of northern Israel with his wife and their one-year-old son.

Instead, Mr Segev is sleeping outdoors beside a column of tanks close to the Israeli - Lebanese border awaiting orders to deploy into southern Lebanon.

"I was expecting the call, I knew it was coming, I was ready," says Mr Segev, who was visiting his mother in Tel Aviv last Friday for Shabbat dinner when he was told by the army to mobilise.

Two hours later he was travelling in his car to a military base in the north of Israel.

"I was at peace with doing it. Unfortunately reserve duty is a normal part of our lives in Israel."

Vital reserves

The reserve platoon commander is one of thousands of Israeli citizens called up by the military to bolster the country's war effort as the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah militants continues into its fourth week.

Because of Israel's small population of about 6.4 million citizens, it depends heavily on the reserves in times of war.

While Israel refuses to say how many reservists have been called, some media estimates say the figure is about 15,000 soldiers.

Almost everyone in Israel knows someone currently serving reserve duty.

Israel's standing army of about 186,500 troops can jump to 631,500 with a mass call-up of reserve soldiers, according to the Jaffee Centre for Strategic Studies in Tel Aviv.

Most 18-year-old Israelis, men and women, serve two to three years of military service in the army.

During the current conflict, some of the reservists are heading for the West Bank replacing better trained soldiers who are transferred to Lebanon to fight Hezbollah.

But like Mr Segev, most of the soldiers willingly do reserve service even if it means disruption to their daily lives or putting themselves in danger.

On Sunday, 12 reserve soldiers were killed by a Hezbollah rocket attack on the Kibbutz Kfar Giladi in northern Israel.

"It's the clearest case of defence I can think of," says Mr Segev, a student of public administration at Hebrew University in Jerusalem. "Israel was attacked within its sovereign borders by a terrorist organisation."

While opinion polls in Israeli newspapers show that an overwhelming majority of the public here support the war, there has been one high profile case of an Israeli reserve army officer refusing to fight.

Amir Fester, 32, was sentenced to 28 days in a military prison for refusing to serve in Lebanon.

Waiting for the call

As the war continues, more reserve soldiers have been notified to expect a call-up.

Many are told by a phone call, others get a brown envelope through their post boxes, while some get a text message sent to their mobiles.

Yoav Kedem, 30, learned of a possible call-up last week.

The youth worker immediately packed a bag of clothes, sun cream, a razor, and two novels. He also removed his brown army combat boots from a cupboard in readiness for deployment.

"I want to join my friends in the north," says Mr Kedem, at his apartment in Jerusalem.

"I have family and friends in Haifa and I feel that this is a war on my house."

But his wife, Hadas, 27, is fraught with worry. She calls him up to six times a day to ask whether he has been drafted.

"But she understands that winning this war is very important for Israel's existence," says Mr Kedem.


epigone - August 9, 2006 02:05 PM (GMT)
http://pdff.sytes.net/index.php?showtopic=3379

If the Finns can do it, much more can we. Although we should not be complacent. remember, we have defense treaties with USA, defense pacts with India, etc. and many more defense pacts. Let's just be prudent in not choosing a belligerent partner.

saver111 - August 10, 2006 11:45 AM (GMT)
What I'm emphasizing is how would the AFP call it Reserves? (Media, Tel/Cell, etc.)
Where would the Reservist report to?
How updated are the Records of the AFP?
Time frame they could activate a unit after mobilization?

This questions crop up in my mind when the calls for assistance on how to evacuate our OFWs was raised. The AFP short of equipments and assets could not do anything. The PCG ever willing, it's capabilities were put into question. It took a lot of convincing and a couple of days before private corporations pledge to support the gov't.

Same goes during calamities. It takes some days before gov't and the AFP could react except for those within the vicinity of bases.

But this could be different if we have Ready Reserve units in all cities, towns and municipalities. I remember there was a move to even have them on the barangay level, but what happened? New OIC, new projects? :dunno:

aldon - August 11, 2006 01:34 AM (GMT)
Big word if, but IF a WW2-like invasion does happen (from anyone, that is)...

...Most politicians, rich people, upper middle class, etc. would take the first avaliable boat/airplane out of the country.
...Those that can't get out of the country will try to get out of the invasion force's way.
...The AFP (those that are left) will call-up all reserves and arm them with whatevers in our armories (WW2-era guns included) then...
...the Army, with soldiers from the Navy (no ships) and Air Force (no planes) fighting as infantry, will fight a delaying action UNTIL help arrives in the form of ASEAN, UN or US forces. Why do you think we have all those mutual defense treaties with other countries for?

Hmm.. its like WW2 all over again. Only this time, we don't have to wait 3 years to get rid of the invaders...hopefully.

This accurate enough?

caterwaul - August 11, 2006 06:34 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (epigone @ Aug 9 2006, 10:05 PM)
http://pdff.sytes.net/index.php?showtopic=3379

If the Finns can do it, much more can we. Although we should not be complacent. remember, we have defense treaties with USA, defense pacts with India, etc. and many more defense pacts. Let's just be prudent in not choosing a belligerent partner.

the finn reservists, like the swiss - are always ready - as a matter of fact, they have their assault rifles, ammo and essential kit in their HOMES ready for any eventuality, now compare that to our reservist stance.

saver111 - August 11, 2006 07:16 AM (GMT)
:exactly: as how the Israelis defends their kibbutzes.

epigone - August 14, 2006 11:31 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (caterwaul @ Aug 11 2006, 02:34 PM)
QUOTE (epigone @ Aug 9 2006, 10:05 PM)
http://pdff.sytes.net/index.php?showtopic=3379

If the Finns can do it, much more can we. Although we should not be complacent. remember, we have defense treaties with USA, defense pacts with India, etc. and many more defense pacts. Let's just be prudent in not choosing a belligerent partner.

the finn reservists, like the swiss - are always ready - as a matter of fact, they have their assault rifles, ammo and essential kit in their HOMES ready for any eventuality, now compare that to our reservist stance.

The Finns called on US to assist them when USSR invaded them. "Mayday, mayday, SOS or whatever". US's decison? We have no defense treaty with you. Sorry.

saver111 - May 9, 2007 02:45 PM (GMT)
This news just made me think of similar situations that often happens to our country.

QUOTE

Tornado renews debate over National Guard delays
State governors fear deployments abroad affect local response

Susan Saulny, Jim Rutenberg, New York Times

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

(05-09) 04:00 PDT Chicago -- For months, Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius and other governors have warned that their state National Guards were ill-prepared for the next local disaster, be it a tornado or a flash flood or a terrorist's threat, because of large deployments of their soldiers and equipment in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Then, Friday night, a deadly tornado all but cleared the small town of Greensburg off the Kansas map. With 80 square blocks of the farming town destroyed, Sebelius said her fears had come true: The emergency response was too slow, she said, and there was only one reason.

"As you travel around Greensburg, you'll see that city and county trucks have been destroyed," Sebelius, a Democrat, said Monday. "The National Guard is one of our first responders. They don't have the equipment they need to come in, and it just makes it that much slower."

For nearly two days after the storm, there was an unmistakable emptiness in Greensburg, a lack of heavy machinery and an army of responders. By Sunday afternoon, only about half of the Guard troops who would ultimately respond were in place.

It was not until Sunday night that significant numbers of military vehicles started to arrive.

Sebelius' comments about the slow response prompted a debate with the White House on Tuesday, which initially said the fault rested with her. White House spokesman Tony Snow said the governor should have followed procedure by finding gaps after the storm hit and asking the federal government to fill them -- but did not.

"If you don't request it, you're not going to get it," Snow told reporters on Tuesday morning.

The debate was reminiscent of White House skirmishes with Louisiana's Democratic Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco after Hurricane Katrina. But after an angry flurry of words, both sides backed down later Tuesday.

Sibelius said she now had enough equipment and personnel to deal with the problems in Greensburg, and the White House acknowledged that the governor had requested several items that the federal government supplied, including a mobile command center and an urban search-and-rescue team.

Nonetheless, the governor and officials in other states again expressed concern that the problem could occur again as stretched National Guard system struggled to respond to disasters at home while also fighting overseas.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency, which came under strong criticism after Hurricane Katrina, seemed to respond more quickly in Kansas. Several of the agency's mobile disaster recovery centers are in Greensburg, and the agency said it has shipped in water and meals.

State officials said the problem with the National Guard's response had more to do with equipment than personnel.

In Kansas, the National Guard is operating with about 40 percent of its vehicles and heavy machinery, local Guard officials said. Ordinarily, the Guard would have about 660 Humvees and more than 30 large trucks to traverse difficult terrain and transport heavy equipment. When the tornado struck, the Guard had fewer than 350 Humvees and 15 trucks.

And the issue is not confined to Kansas. In Ohio, for instance, the National Guard is short of night vision goggles and M-4 rifles, according to a Guard spokesman there, Dr. Mark Wayda.

The California National Guard is similarly concerned about a catastrophic event.

"Our issue is that we are shortchanged when it comes to equipment," said Col. Jon Siepmann, a spokesman for the Guard in California. "We have gone from a strategic reserve to a globally deployable force, and yet our equipment resources have been largely the same levels since before the war."

Last year, all 50 governors signed a letter to President Bush asking for immediate re-equipment of Guard units sent overseas. However, officials in several states, including Kentucky and Minnesota, said on Tuesday that they were not facing a shortage of equipment.

National Guard units overseas are often assigned engineering missions, and those skills and equipment -- bulldozers and trucks, for example -- are exactly what might be required to deal with a natural disaster at home.

Still, White House officials said that the Kansas guard had in the Midwest and the Plains states, everything it needed. Snow said that included 83,000 National Guard soldiers; 99 bulldozers; and 246 dump trucks.

"There's a lot of stuff available," Snow said. "I think this is one where the equipment was available and everybody was moving as rapidly as possible."


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?...MNGUSPNM2O1.DTL

Imagine, a country that is complete with all the equipments, still, delay in response time happens.

jvelarde - May 15, 2007 05:04 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (epigone @ Aug 15 2006, 07:31 AM)
QUOTE (caterwaul @ Aug 11 2006, 02:34 PM)
QUOTE (epigone @ Aug 9 2006, 10:05 PM)
http://pdff.sytes.net/index.php?showtopic=3379

If the Finns can do it, much more can we. Although we should not be complacent. remember, we have defense treaties with USA, defense pacts with India, etc. and many more defense pacts. Let's just be prudent in not choosing a belligerent partner.

the finn reservists, like the swiss - are always ready - as a matter of fact, they have their assault rifles, ammo and essential kit in their HOMES ready for any eventuality, now compare that to our reservist stance.

The Finns called on US to assist them when USSR invaded them. "Mayday, mayday, SOS or whatever". US's decison? We have no defense treaty with you. Sorry.

Caterwaul,

Letting civilian-reservists have their rifles and ammo in their homes might be OK for people in northern Europe (Finland, Switzerland, etc.) or in Israel pero hindi pwede itong scenario sa Pinas.

Just look at the papers during this ongoing election period. Ilang dosenang tao na ang napatay?

With so many of our people unemployed and underemployed, what do you think will happen if these same poor people had M-16's in their homes?

saver111 - June 5, 2007 12:50 PM (GMT)
Something to remember about

user posted image

QUOTE
A Marine platoon sergeant of the 4th Marines instructs Filipino cadets in the use of the Lewis machine gun.


user posted image

QUOTE
Marines teach Filipino aviation cadets the fundamentals of a water-cooled .30-caliber Browning machine gun.

http://www.corregidor.org/chs_41-42/from_s..._corregidor.htm

Learning the skills when its no longer a drill.

LTPAFR - June 8, 2007 02:12 AM (GMT)
I think there are enough weapons stocks in all AFP reserve centers to arm READY RESERVE OFFICERS AND SOLDIERS in time of war. What I'm not sure of is whether they could arm standby and retired reserves.

saver111 - February 7, 2008 11:12 AM (GMT)
Here is how the U.S. sees their situation at present.

QUOTE
US military not prepared for homeland attack - report
02/01/2008 | 08:37 AM

WASHINGTON - Should a catastrophic attack hit the United States, the military would not be ready to thwart it, and National Guard forces lack both the equipment and the training to handle the job, according to a report.

Even fewer Army National Guard units are combat-ready today than almost a year ago when a Commission on the National Guard and Reserves determined that 88 percent of the units were not prepared for the fight, the commission says in the report released Thursday.

The independent panel is commissioned by Congress to recommend changes in law and policy concerning the Guard and Reserves.

The commission's 400-page report concludes that the nation ''does not have sufficient trained, ready forces available'' to respond to a chemical, biological or nuclear weapons incident, ''an appalling gap that places the nation and its citizens at greater risk.''

''Right now we don't have the forces we need, we don't have them trained, we don't have the equipment,'' commission Chairman Arnold Punaro said in an interview with The Associated Press. ''Even though there is a lot going on in this area, we need to do a lot more. ... There's a lot of things in the pipeline, but in the world we live in, you're either ready or you're not.''

In response, Air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, chief of US Northern command, said the Defense Department is putting together a specialized military team that would be designed to respond to such catastrophic events.

''The capability for the Defense Department to respond to a chemical, biological event exists now,'' Renuart told the AP. ''It, today, is not as robust as we would like because of the demand on the forces that we've placed across the country. ... I can do it today. It would be harder on the (military) services, but I could respond.''

Over the next year, Renuart said, specific active duty, Guard and Reserve units will be trained, equipped and assigned to a three-tiered response force totaling about 4,000 troops. There would be a few hundred first responders, who would be followed by a second wave of about 1,200 troops that would include medical and logistics forces.

The third wave, with the remainder of that initial 4,000 troops, would include aircraft units, engineers, and other support forces, depending on the type of incident.

Punaro, a retired Marine Corps major general, had sharp criticism for Northern Command, saying that commanders there have made little progress developing detailed response plans for attacks against the United States.

''NorthCom has got to get religion in this area,'' said Punaro. He said the military needs to avoid ''pickup game'' type responses, such as the much-criticized federal reaction to Hurricane Katrina, and put in place the kind of detailed plans that exist for virtually any international crisis.

He also underscored the commission's main finding: the Pentagon must move toward making the National Guard and Reserves an integral part of the US military.

The panel, in its No. 1 recommendation, said the Defense Department must use the nation's citizen soldiers to create an operational force that would be fully trained, equipped and ready to defend the nation, respond to crises and supplement the active duty troops in combat.

Pointing to the continued strain on the military, as it fights wars on two fronts, the panel said the United States has ''no reasonable alternative'' other than to continue to rely heavily on the reserves to supplement the active duty forces both at home and abroad.

Using reserves as a permanent, ready force, the commission argued, would be a much more cost-effective way to supplement the military since they are about 70 percent cheaper than active duty troops.

Asked how much it would cost to implement the panel's recommendations, Punaro said it will take billions to fully equip the Guard. The commission is going to ask the Congressional Budget Office to do a cost analysis, he said.

While noting that equipment for the reserves has increased in recent years, the report details a shortfall of about $48 billion (€32.3 billion) for equipment as of 2007. And in a detailed map, it shows that in more than half the states, Army Guard units have less than 50 percent of the equipment they need.

Overall, the panel made 95 recommendations, including many personnel, pay, benefits, promotional and other policy changes. The majority, commission members said Thursday, could be implemented immediately or in quick fashion after congressional action. But other more substantive overhauls, Punaro said, could take years. - AP




http://www.gmanews.tv/story/78860/US-milit...attack---report

This is the U.S., with all their fundings, but still is not at par to expectations.

desertranger - February 22, 2008 09:47 PM (GMT)
As I see it now CAFGUs are just being used as mercenary units for local politicians.

markniraq - February 27, 2008 10:27 AM (GMT)
Next time we are in trouble I hope the Finns will come to our rescue......

ambacuroz - March 18, 2008 11:54 AM (GMT)
Let's call the mangkukulams, aswangs, manananggals, kapres, and others to help us win the war




Hosted for free by InvisionFree