Title: Jose Rizal
Description: National hero
Fmr TOPP Awardee 82'PNP - February 28, 2006 09:19 AM (GMT)
Jose Rizal was a controversial Hero,. some believe he is, some not, How about you ?
arvcab - February 28, 2006 10:52 AM (GMT)
Fmr TOPP Awardee 82'PNP - February 28, 2006 07:02 PM (GMT)
I have read the Noli Me Tangere and the El Filibusterismo. I have my own private and personal convictions about him that I only kept it to myself, and I want a second majority plus or negative opinion to reinforce mind or I have to initiate a further research on the issue.
Noki01 - April 13, 2006 09:17 PM (GMT)
:fire: The question should be, "Is Jose Rizal YOUR National Hero?"
Did you know that Jose Rizal is a Mason? Have you ever thought of Masons Ruling the world? It may be a coincidence but all our National presidents are either a Mason or a wife of a mason? (Ninoy, Marcos, Mike Arroyo, Macapagal, etc.)
And during the time of Quezon (Transitional Gov't), they were talking about who our national hero should be. Being influenced by Hare (Mason), Manuel Quezon(Mason) recomended Jose rizal insted of Andres Bonifacio.
Same with the United States. Any Masons in the house? Can you read the archive on Mason Leaders? The military is also saturated with Masons holding key possitions.
:asniper:
Fmr TOPP Awardee 82'PNP - April 13, 2006 09:48 PM (GMT)
Regardless of whether he was mason or not, what we are trying to explore is his feats that may justify declaring him a national hero. Not one individual can declare another individual a hero except when he has done something beneficial for the individual who appreciated his acts.
We are dealiing with Jose Rizal as national hero, so we have to dig some vital facts that made him a hero first. How could I call him my hero, when I was not even born yet when he became one. On why he was declared a hero is the point .
epigone - April 13, 2006 10:39 PM (GMT)
If Rizal has still been alive today he should have been a pro-capitalist, pro-democrat legislator. He was a landowner. He should have been a constitutionalist invoking "No person shall be deprived of private property without just compensation", invoking the provision if ever Sison grabs power and start expropriating land and busines enterprise for his own personal use. Even though he lived through the sweat of his workers, he should had been a pro-capitalist , labor law invoking senator or congressman. He should have been a compassionate and fair-dealing employer basing my asssessment on how passionate he is in defending the oppressed..He would have condemned those heinous crimes and murders committed by Sison. He should have told Sison, "take my picture off the wall". "Don't use my name to propagate senseless killing and terrorism" . He should have been an English speaking Filipino. Somebody with the same financial status of the Spanish Ayalas who would be glad to do business with him. AGAIN, PRO-CAPITALIST AND PRO-DEMOCRAT. PRO-BUSH TOO!!