View Full Version: 40 soldiers secretly detained in Tanay?

Philippines Defense Forces Forum > Philippine Army > 40 soldiers secretly detained in Tanay?


Title: 40 soldiers secretly detained in Tanay?
Description: 26 dischagred from the service


Duminus - October 11, 2007 06:37 AM (GMT)
by JAIME LAUDE

The Philippine Star

Forty Army soldiers accused of involvement in the failed Feb. 24, 2006 coup have been secretly detained in a military stockade in Tanay, Rizal without charges for more than a year now.

The discovery was made by Sen. Rodolfo Biazon, a retired Armed Forces chief, when he visited 28 detained military officers on Monday to check on the physical and health conditions of former Marine commandant Maj. Gen. Renato Miranda, who was reportedly seriously ill.

Army spokesman Lt. Col. Ernesto Torres said the 40 soldiers were detained upon recommendation of the Army inspector general, pending the filing of appropriate cases against them.

Majority of the soldiers were taken to Tanay on July 24 last year, while the rest were brought there on August 1 and in October last year, he added.

The soldiers, who belong to the Army Special Forces and Scout Rangers, were arrested and detained for alleged unauthorized movement to Manila on the eve of the 20th anniversary of the EDSA I People Power uprising.

read more...

:armyeek:

Spidey - October 11, 2007 07:38 AM (GMT)
amazing, no journo ever discovered it until now :armyskeptic:

gagamba - October 13, 2007 05:23 AM (GMT)
that's how GMA administration works my friend. do i need to elaborate?

spellspinner - October 13, 2007 12:49 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Mutiny leaders to be arraigned first before 40 soldiers


By JAIME LAUDE

The Philippine Star

Leaders first before foot soldiers.

This is how the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) intends to deal with the 40 Army enlisted personnel involved in last year’s failed mutiny as they justified the soldiers’ continued detention.

AFP chief Gen. Hermogenes Esperon Jr. said the 28 alleged leaders of the failed coup led by former Marine Commandant Maj. Gen. Renato Miranda would have to be arraigned first before the military court before they tackle the cases of the 40 soldiers.

Miranda, former Marine Scout Ranger chief Brig. Gen. Danilo Lim, along with 26 senior, middle and junior grade Marine and Scout Ranger officers are facing various military charges, including mutiny, for reportedly leading moves to oust President Arroyo last year.

The officers and soldiers are currently detained inside the headquarters of the 2nd Infantry Division in Tanay, Rizal.

Esperon said the 40 enlisted personnel went through a pre-trial investigation.

"The 40 enlisted personnel who were implicated have at this point undergone pre-trial investigation," Esperon said.

He added the AFP is leaving the fate of the soldiers to the Army but pointed out the Army’s action would only come after the alleged leaders of the coup are arraigned.

Esperon said the non-arraignment of the leaders would mean prolonged detention of the enlisted personnel.

"It’s just that we have to jibe things. It will not look good to be punishing the enlisted personnel when the officers, their commanders, have not even been arraigned because, as you may note, they have a lot of dilatory tactics that’s why the arraignment is delayed. So we might as well act on this," Esperon said.

In as much as the AFP wants to have them charged, this could not be done because their commanders should be tried first, he said.

Esperon also said that it would be unfair for the foot soldiers to be charged because they themselves were simply following orders from their immediate superiors.

"Under the rules of military laws that (continued detention) is allowed, that pending resolution of the case, they could be confined," he said.

In the meantime, Esperon said the 40 soldiers would remain restricted or confined under the articles of war.

But despite their detention, the soldiers will continue to receive their pay and allowances.

Esperon also denied a report that the AFP had tried to hide the confinement of the 40 enlisted personnel.

"It was never meant to be hidden," he said.

It was during the visit of opposition Sen. Rodolfo Biazon in Tanay that the detention of the enlisted personnel was made known.

On the delay of the legal proceedings against Miranda et al, Esperon said this was due to the defense’s dilatory tactics.

"Let the court be convened instead of coming up with these dilatory tactics, it’s been more than a year so let’s go to trial and let the truth come out," he said.

But defense lawyer Trixie Angeles took exception to Esperon’s statement, saying that dilatory tactics are not a defense strategy.

"Dilatory is not a defense strategy, rather, it appears to be an AFP policy. Who was it, anyway, who waited five months before serving charges on the Army Scout Rangers? Who waited four months to serve a copy of the pre-trial investigation report and another two months to show a pre-trial advice (PTA)? Who, to this date, has not signed the PTA? Who then caused the bungled service of charges?" Angeles said.

Angeles added: "Who put in more junior officers to pass judgment on General Miranda in contravention of Section 4 of the Manual on Courts Martial requiring senior officers to sit in the panel? Who continues to make prejudicial statements intended to taint the panel and anyone who sits there, thus necessitating the lawyers to challenge them to ensure a fair trial? Who continues to insist that the defense of the rights of the accused be thwarted at every turn?"

Even worse, Esperon waited for the public to get mad before he allowed Miranda to be hospitalized.

"Remember, sir, that human life, no matter whose it is, is not subject to your – or anyone’s – discretion," she said.

Angeles also reminded Esperon that the Constitution guarantees rights of individuals against the massive power of the state.

"Because of the constitutional guarantee, we must take up their defense. If anyone is to blame, it is the person who violated those rights who has caused us to rise in their defense and necessitated proceedings to address them. That violator is the cause of your perceived delay, General Esperon. And you know who that is," she said. Source http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=95689


Esperon is litigating this in the press, and losing badly.

Tormentor - October 14, 2007 02:32 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (gagamba @ Oct 13 2007, 01:23 PM)
that's how GMA administration works my friend. do i need to elaborate?

You're a noob. You really do have to elaborate smart guy. :demon:

spellspinner - October 14, 2007 01:25 PM (GMT)


Sorry, I really have to ask. What is a noob?

saver111 - October 26, 2007 11:15 AM (GMT)
AFP dismisses 26 coup plot suspects

Twenty-six Army soldiers linked to the aborted February 2006 coup were released from detention after being dismissed from service, radio dzMM reported Thursday.

The 26 were "discharged administratively from the military service and released from detention effective this date," said Army spokesman Lt. Col. Ernesto Torres.

There was no need to put them on trial in a military court due to the "preponderance of evidence that they have violated Article of War 67 which is mutiny or sedition and Article of War 97 which is conduct prejudicial to good order and military discipline," he told reporters.

The Philippine Army said the 26 soldiers were brought to Fort Bonifacio in Taguig City from the detention center in Camp Capinpin in Tanay, Rizal before they were discharged. It said the recommendation to dismiss them was made a year ago but Army commanding general Maj. Gen. Alexander Yano postponed its implementation pending their arraignment.

Army officials decided to implement the recommendation since the troops have yet to be charged.

The 26 were among 40 enlisted men reportedly confined in Camp Capinpin for more than a year without charges being filed against them. This was exposed by Sen. Rodolfo Biazon as he warned that the military could be violating the law for continued detention.

Armed Forces Chief of Staff Hermogenes Esperon Jr., however, said the 40 enlisted men were confined to quarters pending the pre-trial investigation of their case.

Fourteen other enlisted men remain in military detention as investigators determine whether they should be subjected to a court martial for their alleged role in the February 2006 plot, he said.

Most of the 40 were from the elite First Scout Ranger Regiment, whose commander, Brig. Gen. Danilo Lim, is also in detention and under investigation for an alleged plot to join planned street protests to call for Arroyo's resignation.

Generals loyal to Mrs. Arroyo, who survived a military mutiny in 2003, nipped the alleged 2006 plot in the bud with the arrest of Lim and several other ranking military and police officers.

List of Philippine Army personnel formerly detained in Camp Capinpin but who were summarily discharged:

1. SSgt Benito S. Baggay 787962 PA
2. Sgt Juanito B. Tercero Jr. 791978 PA
3. Sgt Jose Famularcano Jr. 791999 PA
4. Cpl Giovani B. Bonagua 816232 PA
5. Cpl Medel A Calda 815958 PA
6. Cpl Dennis R Pabillo 816125 PA
7. Cpl Nicomedes P Fernandez 816076 PA
8. Cpl Jorie V Espejo 815278 PA
9. Cpl Rommel C. Pascua 815950 PA
10. Cpl Zaldy A Cabico 815290 PA
11. Cpl Jayson Arellano 815989 PA
12. Cpl Dennis Marzan 809462 PA
13. Pfc Pinley L Amarante 828718 PA
14. Pfc Celso Castromayor Jr 821909 PA
15. Pfc Winston M Tingabngab 843831 PA
16. Pfc Aristotle D Lucena 838393 PA
17. Pfc Kernell F Mahimnayan 843790 PA
18 Pfc Emmanuel M Derilo 843635 PA
19. Pfc Jerry V Avila 838173 PA
20. Pfc Isidro R Areja 833540 PA
21. Pfc Larry A Quinto 843760 PA
22. Pfc Rommel M Puna 833538 PA
23. Pfc Robert B. Palaruan 843625 PA
24. Pfc Dylan F Monton 843617 PA
25. Pfc Arleen S. Garcia 833393 PA
26. Pfc Arvin Daligdig 833428 PA


With Agence France-Presse

http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/storypage.aspx?StoryId=97038

flipzi - October 27, 2007 01:59 PM (GMT)
Biazon seeks review of soldiers’ discharge
By Christina Mendez
Saturday, October 27, 2007

Sen. Rodolfo Biazon sought yesterday to review the military’s decision to discharge from the service some of the soldiers allegedly involved in the coup attempt in February last year.

Biazon, chairman of the Senate committee on national defense and security, stressed the need to re-evaluate the decision of Army chief Lt. Gen. Alexander Yano to discharge 26 of the 40 elite Army Scout Ranger soldiers implicated in the coup attempt.

The soldiers were detained at Camp Capinpin in Tanay, Rizal following their involvement.

“What I am looking into are policies and how these policies were implemented. I think there were shortcomings on the proceedings mandated by Circular No. 17, which was promulgated by (then chief of staff) Gen. (Fidel) Ramos. We should abide by that procedure,” Biazon said.

Biazon said he wanted to know if the soldiers’ discharge orders were administrative or dishonorable under the procedures spelled out by the circular of the Department of National Defense (DND).

“It is required that this (manner of discharge) undergo the prescribed processes including the conduct of an investigation and evaluation of the conduct of the investigation,” Biazon said.

Biazon earlier urged the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) to provide necessary medical help to the military officers detained at Army headquarters at Camp Capinpin.– With Jaime Laude

http://philstar.com/index.php?Headlines&p=...aid=20071026102

Discharging them from service is too harsh considering that Erap got his freedom after being convicted of plunder.

Another is that these elite units could have just followed orders from their superiors that they did not FULLY UNDERSTAND including the possible consequences.

It will be better if PGMA will grant them pardon and reinstate them and have them redeployed immediately in critical areas like Bikol and Mindanao where they are badly needed.

If PGMA freed a convicted plunderer, then why cant she forgive these lowly soldiers who risked their career in their desire to correct the injustice or wrongdoing they've witnessed?

They indeed deserve not just freedom but another chance to correct their misjudgement?


If the people accepted PGMA's "Im Sorry" for her misjudgement in the past, then she should reciprocate that with showing sympathy to these soldiers who were victims of their own twist of misjudgement.

spellspinner - October 28, 2007 10:42 AM (GMT)
Sir, there seems to be a lot wrong with the discharge. First, they were investigated by the Inspector General and the recommendations were reprimand for the three team leaders, and admonition for the others. They were investigated for purposes of determining criminal liability.

However, Gen. Yano's use of the term "preponderance of evidence" implies that the enlisted men were discharged administratively, a process they were not informed about. Neither were they put on guard as to the possibility of discharge since the recommendations were far from that. Also, a dishonorable discharge is a punitive measure that is usually imposed after a court martial. Evidence that must be presented at court martial should establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This means, that a mere preponderance of evidence is not acceptable if the punishment is a dishonorable dismissal.

Also, the investigation was conducted in March 2006, but the men were jailed for over a year and six months. This amounts to a punitive measure, since no charges were ever filed against them, and this exceeds the period and manner of detention provided for under the Articles of War. In other words, they have already been punished far more than they deserve. The administrative discharge goes over and above what they deserve.

Finally, it is strange that the IG recommended that charges be filed against Maj. Oriel Pangcog, head of operations, and the person who ordered that these men go to Manila from Bicol, to augment troops in Fort Bonifacio. They were returning to Bicol when they were arrested. Major Pangcog is one of only two Scout Rangers who was investigated, charged, and then reinstated into service. Gen. Esperon reversed the recommendation of the IG and the pre-trial investigation panel that he (Pangcog) be prosecuted. So he is walking around, free, no taint on his service record, while the troops, are out, "dishonorably discharged."




Hosted for free by InvisionFree